The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20260225114205/https://github.com/github/codeql/pull/8411
Skip to content

Comments

QL: add restrictive transitive closure query#8411

Open
erik-krogh wants to merge 4 commits intogithub:mainfrom
erik-krogh:starRestrict
Open

QL: add restrictive transitive closure query#8411
erik-krogh wants to merge 4 commits intogithub:mainfrom
erik-krogh:starRestrict

Conversation

@erik-krogh
Copy link
Contributor

@erik-krogh erik-krogh commented Mar 11, 2022

Identifies the mistake fixed in this PR: #8380

Basically, a transitive closure might restrict the type when you do zero steps through it, which might not be intentional.
I think the results found by the query are benign (except for the one already fixed, and the one in the experimental query).

@erik-krogh erik-krogh marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2022 20:50
@erik-krogh erik-krogh requested a review from a team as a code owner March 11, 2022 20:50
Copy link
Contributor

@tausbn tausbn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few comments, otherwise this looks good to me.

Out of interest, is there a "canonical" fix for the case where you don't want the type to be restricted?

Comment on lines 46 to 51
not exists(MemberCall memberCall | memberCall.getBase() = c |
not exists(ClassPredicate pred |
pred = superClass*(base).getClassPredicate(memberCall.getMemberName()) and
memberCall.getNumberOfArguments() = pred.getArity()
)
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not exists ... not ... Is this just a forall?

erik-krogh and others added 2 commits July 14, 2022 23:41
Co-authored-by: Taus <tausbn@github.com>
@erik-krogh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Out of interest, is there a "canonical" fix for the case where you don't want the type to be restricted?

The fix I went for was to replace: stepPred*(x) with [x, stepPred+(x)].
That fix should work in all cases.

@erik-krogh erik-krogh requested a review from tausbn August 9, 2022 19:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

HTTPS · web.archive.org
← Home